Shades of Blue
Shades of Blue

Integration: The Missing Piece of Cost Management

Category /
Cost Containment

Share

Subscribe

Most people think cost management in healthcare is about finding cheaper options. Cut here, trim there, negotiate a better deal. But that's like trying to fix a leaky boat by bailing water. You might stay afloat for a while, but you're not solving the real problem.

The real problem? Fragmentation.

Look at any typical healthcare program. You've got your medical claims over here, pharmacy benefits over there, wellness programs somewhere else. Each piece lives in its own silo, operated by different vendors with different goals and different metrics for success. They all promise savings, but none of them talk to each other.

It's chaos. And chaos is expensive.

Think about a recent large claim in your program. How many different entities touched that claim? The TPA processed it. The medical management team reviewed it. The stop-loss carrier got involved. Maybe there was some specialty pharmacy. Each one making decisions based on partial information, each one optimizing for their own metrics rather than the overall outcome.

This fragmentation isn't just inefficient – it's actively harmful. It creates gaps where costs can spiral out of control. It leads to conflicting interventions. Worst of all, it makes it impossible to develop a coherent strategy for managing healthcare costs.

That's why integration matters more than any individual cost-saving solution.

When your program is truly integrated, everything changes. Data flows freely between different components. Decisions are made based on complete information, not fragments. Different parts of your program work together instead of against each other. Most importantly, you can start preventing problems instead of just reacting to them.

This isn't theoretical. Since 2010, our integrated approach has delivered a -3.2% stop-loss trend, while the broader market saw increases into the double digits. That's not because we have some secret cost-cutting formula. It's because we understand that integration is a key component of successful cost containment.

Integration means your specific deductible is tied to your actual performance, not some arbitrary market number. It means 100% of your captive layer surplus comes back to you pro-rata, creating aligned incentives across the board. It means our fee-based compensation model ensures decisions are made based on what's best for members, not what's best for vendors. When everyone in your program is working toward the same goal, guided by the same data, measured by the same metrics – that's when real cost management becomes possible.

This isn't easy. It requires saying no to shiny point solutions that promise quick fixes. It means maintaining disciplined risk alignment even when it would be easier to let things slide. It means choosing long-term stability over short-term savings.

The impact is clear. Our members experience healthcare cost management as a coordinated strategy, not a collection of disconnected tactics. They see their data working for them, their decisions driving results, and their outcomes improving consistently.

Integration isn't just a feature – it's the foundation that transforms healthcare cost management from an expense to an investment.

Join the inner circle. Know the difference.

Get access to the latest from Everlong and issues shaping group health.

Related Articles

Read more from Everlong’s team of experts.

Business people analyzing

The Impact of Member Control on Cost Containment

The healthcare industry often conflates choice with control. While most programs offer employers a selection of pre-packaged options, few provide the practical autonomy needed to influence outcomes. It's like handing someone a steering wheel that isn't connected to the car – sure, they can turn it, but they're not actually driving.

Read the Article
Busy people walking

Beyond Basic Cost Cutting: Cost Containment Strategy

Most "cost containment" in healthcare isn't containment at all. It's reaction. It's looking at last year's claims, finding the biggest numbers, and trying to prevent them from happening again. That's not strategy – that's hindsight masquerading as foresight.

Read the Article

© 2012-

Designed by